City of OnkaparingaCommunity profile

2016 Census data has been released and we are busy processing it to update this website. View our latest releases here.

Skip to content

Huntfield Heights

Household income


This topic has been updated with 2016 Census data for the LGA or other primary area only. What's this?

In Huntfield Heights, 10% of households earned an income of $2,500 or more per week in 2011.

Households form the common 'economic unit' in our society. Huntfield Heights's Household Income is one of the most important indicators of socio-economic status. With other data sources, such as Qualifications and Occupation, it helps to reveal the economic opportunities and socio-economic status of Huntfield Heights. It is important to note that income data is not necessarily a measure of wealth. For example, if an area has a large number of retirees this will produce a higher proportion of households with low income but the retirees may have large capital wealth. For this reason, household income should be viewed in conjunction with Age and Household Composition.

The incomes presented on this page are for the latest Census year only. For comparison of incomes over time, go to Household Income Quartiles.

Derived from the Census question:

'What is the total of all wages/salaries, government benefits, pensions, allowances and other income the person usually receives?'


Weekly household income
Huntfield Heights - Total households (Enumerated)2011
Weekly incomeNumber%City of Onkaparinga %
Negative Income/Nil Income130.90.8
$5000 or more0--0.4
Not stated15210.39.2

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011. Compiled and presented in by .id , the population experts.

Weekly household income, 2011
Weekly household income, 2011 Not stated, City of Onkaparinga: 9.2% $5000 or more, City of Onkaparinga: 0.4% $4000-$4999, City of Onkaparinga: 0.7% $3500-$3999, City of Onkaparinga: 1.0% $3000-$3499, City of Onkaparinga: 2.7% $2500-$2999, City of Onkaparinga: 5.0% $2000-$2499, City of Onkaparinga: 8.6% $1500-$1999, City of Onkaparinga: 12.3% $1250-$1499, City of Onkaparinga: 8.4% $1000-$1249, City of Onkaparinga: 9.2% $800-$999, City of Onkaparinga: 9.3% $600-$799, City of Onkaparinga: 10.3% $400-$599, City of Onkaparinga: 11.0% $300-$399, City of Onkaparinga: 6.8% $200-$299, City of Onkaparinga: 2.9% $1-$199, City of Onkaparinga: 1.4% Negative Income/Nil Income, City of Onkaparinga: 0.8% Not stated, Huntfield Heights: 10.3% $3500-$3999, Huntfield Heights: 0.2% $3000-$3499, Huntfield Heights: 0.7% $2500-$2999, Huntfield Heights: 2.6% $2000-$2499, Huntfield Heights: 6.4% $1500-$1999, Huntfield Heights: 11.2% $1250-$1499, Huntfield Heights: 9.9% $1000-$1249, Huntfield Heights: 9.5% $800-$999, Huntfield Heights: 8.9% $600-$799, Huntfield Heights: 12.6% $400-$599, Huntfield Heights: 12.6% $300-$399, Huntfield Heights: 7.6% $200-$299, Huntfield Heights: 4.5% $1-$199, Huntfield Heights: 2.2% Negative Income/Nil Income, Huntfield Heights: 0.9%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

Analysis of household income levels in Huntfield Heights in 2011 compared to the City of Onkaparinga shows that there was a smaller proportion of high income households (those earning $2,500 per week or more) and a higher proportion of low income households (those earning less than $650 per week).

Overall, 10.5% of the households earned a high income and 40.4% were low income households, compared with 11.3% and 33.2% respectively for the City of Onkaparinga.

The major differences between the household incomes of Huntfield Heights and the City of Onkaparinga were:

  • A larger percentage of households who earned $600-$799 (12.6% compared to 10.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of households who earned $2500-$2999 (2.6% compared to 5.0%)
  • A smaller percentage of households who earned $2000-$2499 (6.4% compared to 8.6%)
  • A smaller percentage of households who earned $3000-$3499 (0.7% compared to 2.7%)