City of Playford
SEIFA - disadvantage by small area
In 2011, One Tree Hill - Rural East had the lowest level of disadvantage in the City of Playford, with a SEIFA index score of 1,083.6.
The City of Playford SEIFA Index of Disadvantage measures the relative level of socio-economic disadvantage based on a range of Census characteristics. It is a good place to start to get a general view of the relative level of disadvantage in one area compared to others and is used to advocate for an area based on its level of disadvantage.
The index is derived from attributes that reflect disadvantage such as low income, low educational attainment, high unemployment, and jobs in relatively unskilled occupations. When targeting services to disadvantaged communities, it is important to also look at these underlying characteristics as they can differ markedly between areas with similar SEIFA scores and shed light on the type of disadvantage being experienced.
A higher score on the index means a lower level of disadvantage. A lower score on the index means a higher level of disadvantage.
The percentile column indicates the approximate position of this small area in a ranked list of Australia’s suburbs and localities. It’s meant to give an indication of where the area sits within the whole nation. A higher number indicates a higher socio-economic status. For instance, a percentile of 72 indicates that approximately 72% of Australia’s suburbs have a SEIFA index lower than this area (more disadvantaged), while 28% are higher.
|Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage|
|City of Playford's small areas and benchmark areas|
|250||One Tree Hill - Rural East||1,083.6||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||90|
|110||Angle Vale||1,062.7||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||81|
|230||Hillbank||1,033.9||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||65|
|50||Australia||1,002.0||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||47|
|20||Greater Adelaide||993.2||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||42|
|120||Blakeview||988.6||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||40|
|40||South Australia||983.3||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||37|
|130||Craigmore||981.1||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||36|
|260||Penfield - Penfield Gardens - MacDonald Park||957.8||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||27|
|100||Andrews Farm||951.5||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||25|
|290||Virginia - Waterloo Corner - Buckland Park||938.3||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||20|
|240||Munno Para - Munno Para West - Munno Para Downs||929.2||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||18|
|10||City of Playford||871.3||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||8|
|270||Smithfield||809.9||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||4|
|150||Elizabeth||787.5||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||4|
|200||Elizabeth Park||781.5||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||4|
|160||Elizabeth Downs||778.4||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||3|
|170||Elizabeth East||772.7||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||3|
|300||Playford North Urban Renewal area||772.2||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||3|
|220||Elizabeth Vale||769.8||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||3|
|190||Elizabeth North||726.2||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||3|
|280||Smithfield Plains||710.6||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||3|
|140||Davoren Park - Elizabeth West||707.4||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||3|
|180||Elizabeth Grove||695.5||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||2|
|210||Elizabeth South||653.7||40004||Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage||2|
|Show me more!|
(Usual residence data)