City of ManninghamCommunity profile
Skip to content

Wonga Park

Housing rental payments

In Wonga Park, 34.9% of renting households were paying more than $400 per week in rent in 2011.

Rental payments can be a better measure of the cost of housing in Wonga Park than mortgage repayments because they are not contingent on length of occupancy or equity in the dwelling.

High rental payments may indicate desirable areas with mobile populations who prefer to rent, or a housing shortage, or gentrification. Low rental payments may indicate public housing (check Tenure Type), or areas where low income households move by necessity for a lower cost of living.

Rental payments are not directly comparable over time because of inflation. For comparison of rental payments over time, go to Housing Rental Quartiles.

Derived from the Census questions:

'How much does your household pay for this dwelling?' and 'Is this dwelling (owned outright, owned with a mortgage etc.)'

Households renting their dwelling

Weekly housing rental payments
Wonga Park2011
Weekly rental amountNumber%City of Manningham %
Nil57.85.5
$1 - $7400.00.7
$75 - $9900.01.2
$100 - $12423.41.2
$125 - $14934.41.1
$150 - $17434.41.2
$175 - $19934.41.3
$200 - $224913.62.3
$225 - $24900.01.8
$250 - $27400.03.5
$275 - $29923.44.2
$300 - $32423.49.1
$325 - $34900.08.3
$350 - $37468.711.7
$375 - $39957.38.3
$400 - $42468.78.6
$425 - $44900.04.1
$450 - $549913.113.5
$550 - $64900.04.5
$650 - $74934.41.7
$750 - $84900.00.6
$850 - $94934.40.3
$950+34.41.0
Rent not stated34.44.4
Total households renting69100.0100.0

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011. Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id , the population experts.

Weekly housing rental payments, 2011
Weekly housing rental payments, 2011 $950+, City of Manningham: 1.0% $850 - $949, City of Manningham: 0.3% $750 - $849, City of Manningham: 0.6% $650 - $749, City of Manningham: 1.7% $550 - $649, City of Manningham: 4.5% $450 - $549, City of Manningham: 13.5% $425 - $449, City of Manningham: 4.1% $400 - $424, City of Manningham: 8.6% $375 - $399, City of Manningham: 8.3% $350 - $374, City of Manningham: 11.7% $325 - $349, City of Manningham: 8.3% $300 - $324, City of Manningham: 9.1% $275 - $299, City of Manningham: 4.2% $250 - $274, City of Manningham: 3.5% $225 - $249, City of Manningham: 1.8% $200 - $224, City of Manningham: 2.3% $175 - $199, City of Manningham: 1.3% $150 - $174, City of Manningham: 1.2% $125 - $149, City of Manningham: 1.1% $100 - $124, City of Manningham: 1.2% $75 - $99, City of Manningham: 1.2% $1 - $74, City of Manningham: 0.7% Nil, City of Manningham: 5.5% $950+, Wonga Park: 4.4% $850 - $949, Wonga Park: 4.4% $750 - $849, Wonga Park: 0.0% $650 - $749, Wonga Park: 4.4% $550 - $649, Wonga Park: 0.0% $450 - $549, Wonga Park: 13.1% $425 - $449, Wonga Park: 0.0% $400 - $424, Wonga Park: 8.7% $375 - $399, Wonga Park: 7.3% $350 - $374, Wonga Park: 8.7% $325 - $349, Wonga Park: 0.0% $300 - $324, Wonga Park: 3.4% $275 - $299, Wonga Park: 3.4% $250 - $274, Wonga Park: 0.0% $225 - $249, Wonga Park: 0.0% $200 - $224, Wonga Park: 13.6% $175 - $199, Wonga Park: 4.4% $150 - $174, Wonga Park: 4.4% $125 - $149, Wonga Park: 4.4% $100 - $124, Wonga Park: 3.4% $75 - $99, Wonga Park: 0.0% $1 - $74, Wonga Park: 0.0% Nil, Wonga Park: 7.8%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

Analysis of the weekly housing rental payments of households in Wonga Park compared to City of Manningham shows that there was a larger proportion of households paying high rental payments ($400 per week or more), as well as a larger proportion of households with low rental payments (less than $150 per week).

Overall, 34.9% of households were paying high rental payments, and 15.5% were paying low payments, compared with 34.3% and 9.7% respectively in City of Manningham.

The major differences between the housing rental payments of Wonga Park and City of Manningham were:

  • A larger percentage of $200 - $224 (13.6% compared to 2.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of $325 - $349 (0.0% compared to 8.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of $550 - $649 (0.0% compared to 4.5%)
  • A smaller percentage of $425 - $449 (0.0% compared to 4.1%)