idc-logo
svg rectangle color
Adelaide Primary Health NetworkCommunity profile

Adelaide Primary Health Network

SEIFA by profile area

reset

In 2021, City of Burnside had the highest level of Advantage in the Adelaide Primary Health Network, with a SEIFA index score of 1,101.8.

The Adelaide Primary Health Network Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) measure the relative level of socio-economic disadvantage and/or advantage based on a range of Census characteristics. Two of the SEIFA indexes: the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD) and the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD) can be selected below.

Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD)

This index contains only disadvantage indicators (e.g. unemployment, low incomes or education levels, single parent families, low skilled occupations, poor English proficiency), so is best used to distinguish between disadvantaged areas, but doesn’t differentiate between those areas which are highly advantaged, and those just lacking a lot of disadvantage (with population close to the middle). This index is most commonly used for funding allocations and advocacy, because it highlights the areas of most need.

Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD)

This index contains indicators of disadvantage as well as additional indicators of advantage (e.g. professional occupations, high income, higher education levels, high rent, large dwellings), Characteristics are also weighted differently than the IRSD, so areas do score differently on either measure. Often the IRSAD index will show a more "spread out" distribution with a greater range of scores from very high to very low, due to its ability to measure advantage above the average level.

SEIFA indexes are a good place to start to get a general view of the relative level of disadvantage in one area compared to others, but it is important to also look at these underlying characteristics as they can differ markedly between areas with similar SEIFA scores and shed light on the type of disadvantage being experienced.

A higher score on the index means a lower level of disadvantage, or (in the case of IRSAD only) a higher level of advantage. A lower score on the index means a higher level of disadvantage on both indexes, and a lack of advantage on the IRSAD.

The percentile column indicates the approximate position of this small area in a ranked list of Australia’s suburbs and localities in 2021. It's meant to give a broad indication of where the area sits within the whole nation. A higher number indicates a higher socio-economic status. For instance, a percentile of 72 indicates that approximately 72% of Australia’s suburbs have a SEIFA index lower than this area (more disadvantaged), while 28% are higher. This applies a comparison to suburbs even when the index concerned doesn’t relate to a suburb.

Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage
Adelaide Primary Health Network's small areas and benchmark areas
Area2021 indexPercentile
City of Burnside1,101.896
Town of Walkerville1,096.895
City of Unley1,084.493
City of Mitcham1,072.991
City of Prospect1,057.886
Adelaide City1,057.786
City of Norwood, Payneham, St Peters1,052.185
City of Holdfast Bay1,043.681
Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN)1,024.272
Campbelltown City1,012.065
City of West Torrens1,009.764
Australia1,002.660
City of Tea Tree Gully995.756
City of Marion994.055
Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN)993.254
City of Charles Sturt993.154
Greater Adelaide982.048
Adelaide Primary Health Network980.247
South Australia968.040
City of Port Adelaide Enfield953.132
City of Onkaparinga951.231
Northern Adelaide Local Health Network (NALHN)920.518
City of Salisbury897.612
City of Playford850.15
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2021. Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (informed decisions).
Please refer to specific data notes for more information

DISCLAIMER: While all due care has been taken to ensure that the content of this website is accurate and current, there may be errors or omissions in it and no legal responsibility is accepted for the information and opinions in this website.

Please view our Privacy Policy, Terms of use and Legal notices.

ABS Data and the copyright in the ABS Data remains the property of the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The copyright in the way .id has modified, transformed or reconfigured the ABS Data as published on this website remains the property of .id. ABS Data can be accessed from the Australian Bureau of Statistics at www.abs.gov.au. ABS data can be used under license - terms published on ABS website. intermediary.management@abs.gov.au if you have any queries or wish to distribute any ABS data.