City of WhittleseaCommunity profile
Skip to content

Mill Park

Method of travel to work

On Census day 2016 in Mill Park, 80.1% of males travelled to work in a private car, 9.3% took public transport and 0.7% rode a bike or walked. 1.2% worked at home.

Mill Park's commuting statistics reveal the main modes of transport by which residents get to work. There are a number of reasons why people use different modes of transport to get to work including the availability of affordable and effective public transport options, the number of motor vehicles available within a household, and the distance travelled to work.

Commuting data is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the availability, effectiveness and utilisation of local transport options, particularly when analysed with Residents Place of Work data and Car Ownership.

WARNING: Method of travel to work relates to Census day, which for the 2021 Census occurred during COVID-19 lockdowns for large parts of Australia. In lockdown, many occupations were required to work from home if possible, and some industries were closed, so people did not go to work. For this reason, these categories may have increased, with corresponding declines in other methods of travel. Use the data with caution when comparing over time. For more details, please refer to the data notes.

Derived from the Census question:

'How did the person get to work on Tuesday, 10 August 2021?'

Employed persons aged 15 years and over

Method of travel to work
Mill Park - Employed males (Usual residence)20162011Change
Main method of travelNumber%Australia %Number%Australia %2011 to 2016
Train
6168.37.14625.76.1+154
Bus
400.53.3730.93.1-33
Tram
370.50.5200.20.4+17
Ferry
0--0.10--0.10
Taxi/ride-share
0--0.2240.30.3-24
Car - as driver
5,71476.764.26,10974.863.0-395
Car - as passenger
2523.43.83794.74.6-128
Truck
751.01.51672.11.9-93
Motorbike
30.01.0180.21.1-15
map this data in atlas.idBicycle240.31.4140.21.5+10
map this data in atlas.idWalked only280.43.3340.43.6-5
Other
380.51.8881.11.7-49
map this data in atlas.idWorked at home911.23.9620.83.7+29
Did not go to work
4596.26.95266.57.5-67
Not stated
660.91.01872.31.5-122

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2011 and 2016. Compiled and presented by .id (informed decisions).

Method of travel to work, 2016
Method of travel to work, 2016 Train, Australia: 7.1% Bus, Australia: 3.3% Tram, Australia: 0.5% Ferry, Australia: 0.1% Taxi/ride-share, Australia: 0.2% Car - as driver, Australia: 64.2% Car - as passenger, Australia: 3.8% Truck, Australia: 1.5% Motorbike, Australia: 1.0% Bicycle, Australia: 1.4% Walked only, Australia: 3.3% Other, Australia: 1.8% Worked at home, Australia: 3.9% Did not go to work, Australia: 6.9% Not stated, Australia: 1.0% Train, Mill Park: 8.3% Bus, Mill Park: 0.5% Tram, Mill Park: 0.5% Car - as driver, Mill Park: 76.7% Car - as passenger, Mill Park: 3.4% Truck, Mill Park: 1.0% Motorbike, Mill Park: 0.0% Bicycle, Mill Park: 0.3% Walked only, Mill Park: 0.4% Other, Mill Park: 0.5% Worked at home, Mill Park: 1.2% Did not go to work, Mill Park: 6.2% Not stated, Mill Park: 0.9%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016 (Usual residence data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (informed decisions).
Change in method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016
Change in method of travel to work, 2011 to 2016 Train, Mill Park: +154 Bus, Mill Park: -33 Tram, Mill Park: +17 Ferry, Mill Park: 0 Taxi/ride-share, Mill Park: -24 Car - as driver, Mill Park: -395 Car - as passenger, Mill Park: -128 Truck, Mill Park: -93 Motorbike, Mill Park: -15 Bicycle, Mill Park: +10 Walked only, Mill Park: -5 Other, Mill Park: -49 Worked at home, Mill Park: +29 Did not go to work, Mill Park: -67 Not stated, Mill Park: -122
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 and 2016 (Usual residence data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (informed decisions).

Dominant groups

In 2016, there were 693 males who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Mill Park, compared with 6,044 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the male residents in Mill Park in 2016, compared to Australia, shows that 9.3% used public transport, while 80.1% used a private vehicle, compared with 11.0% and 67.9% respectively in Australia.

The major differences in males between the method of travel to work of Mill Park and Australia were:

  • A larger percentage of males who travelled by car (as driver) (76.7% compared to 64.2%)
  • A smaller percentage of males who walked only (0.4% compared to 3.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of males who travelled by bus (0.5% compared to 3.3%)
  • A smaller percentage of males who worked at home (1.2% compared to 3.9%)

Emerging groups

The number of employed males in Mill Park decreased by 722 between 2011 and 2016.

The largest changes in the method of travel to work by male resident population in Mill Park between 2011 and 2016 were for those nominated:

  • Car - as driver (-395 males)
  • Train (+154 males)
  • Car - as passenger (-128 males)
  • Not stated (-122 males)

To continue building your demographic story go to...

v20.11.10-1.0.0