City of UnleyCommunity profile
Skip to content

In Myrtle Bank, 65% of households were purchasing or fully owned their home, 13.6% were renting privately, and 3.9% were in social housing in 2011.

Myrtle Bank's Housing Tenure data provides insights into its socio-economic status as well as the role it plays in the housing market. For example, a high concentration of private renters may indicate a transient area attractive to young singles and couples, while a concentration of home owners indicates a more settled area with mature families and empty-nesters (Household Summary). Tenure can also reflect built form (Dwelling Type), with a significantly higher share of renters in high density housing and a substantially larger proportion of home-owners in separate houses, although this is not always the case.

In conjunction with other socio-economic status indicators in Myrtle Bank, Tenure data is useful for analysing housing markets, housing affordability and identifying public housing areas.

Derived from the Census questions:

'Is this dwelling (owned outright, owned with a mortgage etc.)', and 'If this dwelling is being rented, who is it rented from?'

Households

Housing tenure
Myrtle Bank20112006Change
Tenure typeNumber%City of Unley %Number%City of Unley %2006 to 2011
map this data in atlas.idFully owned43338.933.042140.632.3+12
map this data in atlas.idMortgage28825.930.228527.531.1+3
Renting
20118.030.218417.829.8+17
map this data in atlas.idRenting - Social housing433.93.8292.83.9+14
map this data in atlas.idRenting - Private15213.625.814814.325.2+4
Renting - Not stated
60.50.570.70.7-1
Other tenure type
12511.22.0959.21.9+30
Not stated
676.04.7514.94.8+16

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2006 and 2011. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Housing tenure, 2011
Housing tenure, 2011 Other tenure type, City of Unley: 2.0% Renting - Private, City of Unley: 25.8% Renting - Social housing, City of Unley: 3.8% Renting, City of Unley: 30.2% Mortgage, City of Unley: 30.2% Fully owned, City of Unley: 33.0% Other tenure type, Myrtle Bank: 11.2% Renting - Private, Myrtle Bank: 13.6% Renting - Social housing, Myrtle Bank: 3.9% Renting, Myrtle Bank: 18.0% Mortgage, Myrtle Bank: 25.9% Fully owned, Myrtle Bank: 38.9%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in housing tenure, 2006 to 2011
Change in housing tenure, 2006 to 2011 Other tenure type, Myrtle Bank: +30 Renting - Private, Myrtle Bank: +4 Renting - Social housing, Myrtle Bank: +14 Renting, Myrtle Bank: +17 Mortgage, Myrtle Bank: +3 Fully owned, Myrtle Bank: +12
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2006 and 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

Analysis of the housing tenure of the population of Myrtle Bank in 2011 compared to the City of Unley shows that there was a larger proportion of households who owned their dwelling; a smaller proportion purchasing their dwelling; and a smaller proportion who were renters.

Overall, 38.9% of the population owned their dwelling; 25.9% were purchasing, and 18.0% were renting, compared with 33.0%, 30.2% and 30.2% respectively for the City of Unley.

Emerging groups

There were no major differences in Myrtle Bank between 2006 and 2011.

The total number of households in Myrtle Bank increased by 78 between 2006 and 2011.