City of Tea Tree GullyCommunity profile
Skip to content

Highbury - Paracombe

Method of travel to work

In Highbury - Paracombe 23 people rode their bike or walked to work in 2011.

Highbury - Paracombe's commuting statistics reveal the main modes of transport by which residents get to work. There are a number of reasons why people use different modes of transport to get to work including the availability of affordable and effective public transport options, the number of motor vehicles available within a household, and the distance travelled to work.

Commuting data is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the availability, effectiveness and utilisation of local transport options, particularly when analysed with Residents Place of Work data and Car Ownership.

Derived from the Census question:

'How did the person get to work on Tuesday, 9 August 2011?'

Employed persons (aged 15 years and over)

Method of travel to work
Highbury - Paracombe - (Enumerated)20112006Change
Main method of travelNumber%City of Tea Tree Gully %Number%City of Tea Tree Gully %2006 to 2011
Train
00.00.260.20.1-6
Bus
3319.99.82968.59.4+35
Tram or Ferry
00.00.130.10.0-3
Taxi
80.20.100.00.1+8
Car - as driver
2,28968.367.22,32566.565.8-36
Car - as passenger
1263.84.41404.05.1-14
Truck
200.60.7381.10.9-18
Motorbike
300.90.4160.50.5+14
map this data in atlas.idBicycle180.50.4310.90.4-13
map this data in atlas.idWalked only50.10.9170.51.0-12
Other
250.70.9421.20.9-17
map this data in atlas.idWorked at home1334.02.61283.72.6+5
Did not go to work
33910.111.338711.111.7-48
Not stated
260.81.0661.91.4-40

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2006 and 2011. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Method of travel to work, 2011
Method of travel to work, 2011 Train, City of Tea Tree Gully: 0.2% Bus, City of Tea Tree Gully: 9.8% Tram or Ferry, City of Tea Tree Gully: 0.1% Taxi, City of Tea Tree Gully: 0.1% Car - as driver, City of Tea Tree Gully: 67.2% Car - as passenger, City of Tea Tree Gully: 4.4% Truck, City of Tea Tree Gully: 0.7% Motorbike, City of Tea Tree Gully: 0.4% Bicycle, City of Tea Tree Gully: 0.4% Walked only, City of Tea Tree Gully: 0.9% Other, City of Tea Tree Gully: 0.9% Worked at home, City of Tea Tree Gully: 2.6% Did not go to work, City of Tea Tree Gully: 11.3% Not stated, City of Tea Tree Gully: 1.0% Train, Highbury - Paracombe: 0.0% Bus, Highbury - Paracombe: 9.9% Tram or Ferry, Highbury - Paracombe: 0.0% Taxi, Highbury - Paracombe: 0.2% Car - as driver, Highbury - Paracombe: 68.3% Car - as passenger, Highbury - Paracombe: 3.8% Truck, Highbury - Paracombe: 0.6% Motorbike, Highbury - Paracombe: 0.9% Bicycle, Highbury - Paracombe: 0.5% Walked only, Highbury - Paracombe: 0.1% Other, Highbury - Paracombe: 0.7% Worked at home, Highbury - Paracombe: 4.0% Did not go to work, Highbury - Paracombe: 10.1% Not stated, Highbury - Paracombe: 0.8%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in method of travel to work, 2006 to 2011
Change in method of travel to work, 2006 to 2011 Train, Highbury - Paracombe: -6 Bus, Highbury - Paracombe: +35 Tram or Ferry, Highbury - Paracombe: -3 Taxi, Highbury - Paracombe: +8 Car - as driver, Highbury - Paracombe: -36 Car - as passenger, Highbury - Paracombe: -14 Truck, Highbury - Paracombe: -18 Motorbike, Highbury - Paracombe: +14 Bicycle, Highbury - Paracombe: -13 Walked only, Highbury - Paracombe: -12 Other, Highbury - Paracombe: -17 Worked at home, Highbury - Paracombe: +5 Did not go to work, Highbury - Paracombe: -48 Not stated, Highbury - Paracombe: -40
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2006 and 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2011, there were 331 people who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Highbury - Paracombe, compared with 2,465 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the residents in Highbury - Paracombe in 2011, compared to the City of Tea Tree Gully, shows that 9.9% used public transport, while 73.6% used a private vehicle, compared with 10.1% and 72.7% respectively in the City of Tea Tree Gully.

The major differences in persons between the method of travel to work of Highbury - Paracombe and the City of Tea Tree Gully were:

  • A larger percentage of persons who worked at home (4.0% compared to 2.6%)
  • A larger percentage of persons who travelled by car (as driver) (68.3% compared to 67.2%)
  • A smaller percentage of persons who did not go to work (10.1% compared to 11.3%)

Emerging groups

The number of employed people in Highbury - Paracombe decreased by 143 between 2006 and 2011.

There were no major differences in Highbury - Paracombe between 2006 and 2011.

To continue building your demographic story go to...