Housing loan repayments
In Glen Waverley, 28.5% of households with a mortgage were making high loan repayments of $2,600 or more per month in 2011.
Mortgage repayments are directly related to house prices in Glen Waverley, length of occupancy and the level of equity of home owners. When viewed with Household Income data it may also indicate the level of housing stress households in the community are under. In mortgage belt areas it is expected that households will be paying a higher proportion of their income on their housing compared to well-established areas. First home buyer areas are also likely to have larger mortgages than upgrader areas where households move in with equity from elsewhere.
Mortgage payment levels are not directly comparable over time because of inflation. For comparison of mortgage payments over time, go to Housing Loan Quartiles.
Derived from the Census questions:
Households with a mortgage
|Monthly housing loan repayments|
|Glen Waverley - Households (Enumerated)||2011|
|Monthly repayment amount||Number||%||City of Monash %|
|$5000 and over||106||2.8||3.0||23019|
|Total households with a mortgage||3,773||100.0||100.0|
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing (opens a new window) 2011. Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (opens a new window), the population experts.
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.
Analysis of the monthly housing loan repayments of households in Glen Waverley compared to City of Monash shows that there was a similar proportion of households paying high mortgage repayments ($2,600 per month or more), and a larger proportion of households with low mortgage repayments (less than $1000 per month).
Overall, 28.5% of households were paying high mortgage repayments, and 19.6% were paying low repayments, compared with 28.9% and 17.7% respectively in City of Monash.
The major difference between the household loan repayments of Glen Waverley and City of Monash is:
- A larger percentage of Nil repayments (4.9% compared to 3.3%)