City of MitchamCommunity profile
census-message-logo

We’re continuing to update these pages with data from the 2016 Census. Read more about our updates.

Skip to content

Pasadena

Housing rental payments

census-message-logo

This topic has been updated with 2016 Census data for all areas. What's this?

In Pasadena, 6.9% of renting households were paying $450 or more per week in rent in 2016.

Rental payments can be a better measure of the cost of housing in Pasadena than mortgage repayments because they are not contingent on length of occupancy or equity in the dwelling.

High rental payments may indicate desirable areas with mobile populations who prefer to rent, or a housing shortage, or gentrification. Low rental payments may indicate public housing (check Tenure Type), or areas where low income households move by necessity for a lower cost of living.

Rental payments are not directly comparable over time because of inflation. For comparison of rental payments over time, go to Housing Rental Quartiles.

Derived from the Census questions:

'How much does your household pay for this dwelling?' and 'Is this dwelling (owned outright, owned with a mortgage etc.)'

Households renting their dwelling

Weekly housing rental payments
Pasadena - Households (Enumerated)2016
Weekly rental amountNumber%City of Mitcham %
$99 or less2511.56.8
$100 - $149136.05.0
$150 - $19994.15.8
$200 - $2492310.610.4
$250 - $2994922.618.4
$300 - $3493817.515.7
$350 - $3992310.613.5
$400 - $44983.78.4
$450 - $549125.57.1
$550 - $64931.43.2
$650 - $7490--1.3
$750 - $8490--0.4
$850+0--0.8
Not stated146.53.1

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2016. Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id , the population experts.

Weekly housing rental payments, 2016
Weekly housing rental payments, 2016 $850+, City of Mitcham: 0.8% $750 - $849, City of Mitcham: 0.4% $650 - $749, City of Mitcham: 1.3% $550 - $649, City of Mitcham: 3.2% $450 - $549, City of Mitcham: 7.1% $400 - $449, City of Mitcham: 8.4% $350 - $399, City of Mitcham: 13.5% $300 - $349, City of Mitcham: 15.7% $250 - $299, City of Mitcham: 18.4% $200 - $249, City of Mitcham: 10.4% $150 - $199, City of Mitcham: 5.8% $100 - $149, City of Mitcham: 5.0% $99 or less, City of Mitcham: 6.8% $550 - $649, Pasadena: 1.4% $450 - $549, Pasadena: 5.5% $400 - $449, Pasadena: 3.7% $350 - $399, Pasadena: 10.6% $300 - $349, Pasadena: 17.5% $250 - $299, Pasadena: 22.6% $200 - $249, Pasadena: 10.6% $150 - $199, Pasadena: 4.1% $100 - $149, Pasadena: 6.0% $99 or less, Pasadena: 11.5%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

Analysis of the weekly housing rental payments of households in Pasadena compared to the City of Mitcham shows that there was a smaller proportion of households paying high rental payments ($450 per week or more), and a larger proportion of households with low rental payments (less than $250 per week).

Overall, 6.9% of households were paying high rental payments, and 32.3% were paying low payments, compared with 12.8% and 28.0% respectively in the City of Mitcham.

The major differences between the housing rental payments of Pasadena and the City of Mitcham were:

  • A larger percentage of $99 or less (11.5% compared to 6.8%)
  • A larger percentage of $250 - $299 (22.6% compared to 18.4%)
  • A smaller percentage of $400 - $449 (3.7% compared to 8.4%)
  • A smaller percentage of $350 - $399 (10.6% compared to 13.5%)
v17.12.12-1.0.0