Livingstone ShireCommunity profile
Skip to content

Rosslyn to Kinka Beach

Housing tenure

In Rosslyn to Kinka Beach, 69% of households were purchasing or fully owned their home, 21.6% were renting privately, and 0.0% were in social housing in 2021.

Rosslyn to Kinka Beach's Housing Tenure data provides insights into its socio-economic status as well as the role it plays in the housing market. For example, a high concentration of private renters may indicate a transient area attractive to young singles and couples, while a concentration of home owners indicates a more settled area with mature families and empty-nesters (Household Summary). Tenure can also reflect built form (Dwelling Type), with a significantly higher share of renters in high density housing and a substantially larger proportion of home-owners in separate houses, although this is not always the case.

In conjunction with other socio-economic status indicators in Rosslyn to Kinka Beach, Tenure data is useful for analysing housing markets, housing affordability and identifying public housing areas.

Further reading: How can Councils influence affordable housing.

Derived from the Census questions:

'Is this dwelling (owned outright, owned with a mortgage etc.)', and 'If this dwelling is being rented, who is it rented from?'

Households

Housing tenure
Rosslyn to Kinka Beach - Households (Enumerated)20212016Change
Tenure typeNumber%Emu Park %Number%Emu Park %2016 to 2021
map this data in atlas.idFully owned66539.346.556939.939.2+96
map this data in atlas.idMortgage49629.326.037726.424.1+119
Renting - Total
36621.619.029020.324.9+76
map this data in atlas.idRenting - Social housing00.02.600.03.80
map this data in atlas.idRenting - Private36621.616.129020.321.1+76
Renting - Not stated
00.00.300.0--0
Other tenure type
231.41.4120.81.9+11
Not stated
1438.47.117812.59.9-35

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2016 and 2021. Compiled and presented by .id (informed decisions).

Housing tenure, 2021
Housing tenure, 2021 Other tenure type, Emu Park: 1.4% Renting - Private, Emu Park: 16.1% Renting - Social housing, Emu Park: 2.6% Renting - Total, Emu Park: 19.0% Mortgage, Emu Park: 26.0% Fully owned, Emu Park: 46.5% Other tenure type, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: 1.4% Renting - Private, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: 21.6% Renting - Social housing, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: 0.0% Renting - Total, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: 21.6% Mortgage, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: 29.3% Fully owned, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: 39.3%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2021 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (informed decisions).
Change in housing tenure, 2016 to 2021
Change in housing tenure, 2016 to 2021 Other tenure type, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: +11 Renting - Private, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: +76 Renting - Social housing, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: 0 Renting - Total, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: +76 Mortgage, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: +119 Fully owned, Rosslyn to Kinka Beach: +96
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016 and 2021 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (informed decisions).

Dominant groups

Analysis of the housing tenure of households of Rosslyn to Kinka Beach in 2021 compared to Emu Park shows that there was a smaller proportion of households who owned their dwelling; a larger proportion purchasing their dwelling; and a larger proportion who were renters.

Overall, 39.3% of households owned their dwelling; 29.3% were purchasing, and 21.6% were renting, compared with 46.5%, 26.0% and 19.0% respectively for Emu Park.

Emerging groups

The largest changes in housing tenure categories for the households in Rosslyn to Kinka Beach between 2016 and 2021 were:

  • Mortgage (+119 households)
  • Fully owned (+96 households)
  • Renting - Private (+76 households)

The total number of households in Rosslyn to Kinka Beach increased by 267 between 2016 and 2021.

v20.11.10-1.0.0