City of Charles SturtCommunity profile
Skip to content

Woodville Ward

Method of travel to work

In Woodville Ward 226 people rode their bike or walked to work in 2011.

Woodville Ward's commuting statistics reveal the main modes of transport by which residents get to work. There are a number of reasons why people use different modes of transport to get to work including the availability of affordable and effective public transport options, the number of motor vehicles available within a household, and the distance travelled to work.

Commuting data is very useful in transport planning as it informs decision-makers about the availability, effectiveness and utilisation of local transport options, particularly when analysed with Residents Place of Work data and Car Ownership.

Derived from the Census question:

'How did the person get to work on Tuesday, 9 August 2011?'

Employed persons (aged 15 years and over)

Method of travel to work
Woodville Ward - (Enumerated)20112006Change
Main method of travelNumber%City of Charles Sturt %Number%City of Charles Sturt %2006 to 2011
Train
2774.72.42114.22.3+66
Bus
2564.45.41833.75.8+73
Tram or Ferry
70.10.630.10.0+4
Taxi
180.30.3120.20.3+6
Car - as driver
3,72363.864.63,21064.463.9+513
Car - as passenger
3836.65.73106.25.8+73
Truck
280.50.7430.90.8-15
Motorbike
370.60.5310.60.6+6
map this data in atlas.idBicycle951.61.5731.51.7+22
map this data in atlas.idWalked only1312.21.81573.22.2-26
Other
831.41.7450.90.9+38
map this data in atlas.idWorked at home1152.02.71362.72.7-21
Did not go to work
5709.810.74799.611.2+91
Not stated
1071.81.5881.81.8+19

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2006 and 2011. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Method of travel to work, 2011
Method of travel to work, 2011 Train, City of Charles Sturt: 2.4% Bus, City of Charles Sturt: 5.4% Tram or Ferry, City of Charles Sturt: 0.6% Taxi, City of Charles Sturt: 0.3% Car - as driver, City of Charles Sturt: 64.6% Car - as passenger, City of Charles Sturt: 5.7% Truck, City of Charles Sturt: 0.7% Motorbike, City of Charles Sturt: 0.5% Bicycle, City of Charles Sturt: 1.5% Walked only, City of Charles Sturt: 1.8% Other, City of Charles Sturt: 1.7% Worked at home, City of Charles Sturt: 2.7% Did not go to work, City of Charles Sturt: 10.7% Not stated, City of Charles Sturt: 1.5% Train, Woodville Ward: 4.7% Bus, Woodville Ward: 4.4% Tram or Ferry, Woodville Ward: 0.1% Taxi, Woodville Ward: 0.3% Car - as driver, Woodville Ward: 63.8% Car - as passenger, Woodville Ward: 6.6% Truck, Woodville Ward: 0.5% Motorbike, Woodville Ward: 0.6% Bicycle, Woodville Ward: 1.6% Walked only, Woodville Ward: 2.2% Other, Woodville Ward: 1.4% Worked at home, Woodville Ward: 2.0% Did not go to work, Woodville Ward: 9.8% Not stated, Woodville Ward: 1.8%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in method of travel to work, 2006 to 2011
Change in method of travel to work, 2006 to 2011 Train, Woodville Ward: +66 Bus, Woodville Ward: +73 Tram or Ferry, Woodville Ward: +4 Taxi, Woodville Ward: +6 Car - as driver, Woodville Ward: +513 Car - as passenger, Woodville Ward: +73 Truck, Woodville Ward: -15 Motorbike, Woodville Ward: +6 Bicycle, Woodville Ward: +22 Walked only, Woodville Ward: -26 Other, Woodville Ward: +38 Worked at home, Woodville Ward: -21 Did not go to work, Woodville Ward: +91 Not stated, Woodville Ward: +19
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2006 and 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

In 2011, there were 540 people who caught public transport to work (train, bus, tram or ferry) in Woodville Ward, compared with 4,171 who drove in private vehicles (car – as driver, car – as passenger, motorbike, or truck).

Analysis of the method of travel to work of the residents in Woodville Ward in 2011, compared to the City of Charles Sturt, shows that 9.3% used public transport, while 71.5% used a private vehicle, compared with 8.4% and 71.4% respectively in the City of Charles Sturt.

The major differences in persons between the method of travel to work of Woodville Ward and the City of Charles Sturt were:

  • A larger percentage of persons who travelled by train (4.7% compared to 2.4%)
  • A smaller percentage of persons who travelled by bus (4.4% compared to 5.4%)

Emerging groups

The number of employed people in Woodville Ward increased by 852 between 2006 and 2011.

The largest changes in the method of travel to work by resident population in Woodville Ward between 2006 and 2011 were for those nominated:

  • Car - as driver (+513 persons)
  • Did not go to work (+91 persons)
  • Bus (+73 persons)
  • Car - as passenger (+73 persons)

To continue building your demographic story go to...