City of CaseyCommunity profile
Skip to content

Botanic Ridge - Junction Village

Household type

In Botanic Ridge - Junction Village, 38% of households were made up of couples with children in 2011, compared with 44% in the City of Casey.

Botanic Ridge - Junction Village's household and family structure is one of the most important demographic indicators. It reveals the area's residential role and function, era of settlement and provides key insights into the level of demand for services and facilities as most are related to age and household types.

To continue building the story, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village's Household Summary should be viewed in conjunction with Households with Children, Households without Children, Household Size, Age Structure and Dwelling Type.

Derived from the Census question:

‘What is the person’s relationship (to each other person in the household)?’

Households

Household type
Botanic Ridge - Junction Village20112006Change
Households by typeNumber%City of Casey %Number%City of Casey %2006 to 2011
map this data in atlas.idCouples with children36938.344.49626.044.0+272
map this data in atlas.idCouples without children31933.121.812433.321.5+195
map this data in atlas.idOne parent families616.312.6246.512.4+37
Other families
90.91.100.00.9+9
map this data in atlas.idGroup household171.72.1113.02.2+6
map this data in atlas.idLone person17017.715.310728.915.5+63
Other not classifiable household
151.52.382.33.2+6
Visitor only households
30.30.400.00.4+3

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2006 and 2011. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Household type, 2011
Household type, 2011 Lone person, City of Casey: 15.3% Group household, City of Casey: 2.1% Other families, City of Casey: 1.1% One parent families, City of Casey: 12.6% Couples without children, City of Casey: 21.8% Couples with children, City of Casey: 44.4% Lone person, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: 17.7% Group household, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: 1.7% Other families, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: 0.9% One parent families, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: 6.3% Couples without children, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: 33.1% Couples with children, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: 38.3%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in household type, 2006 to 2011
Change in household type, 2006 to 2011 Lone person, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: +63 Group household, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: +6 Other families, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: +9 One parent families, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: +37 Couples without children, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: +195 Couples with children, Botanic Ridge - Junction Village: +272
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2006 and 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

Analysis of the household/family types in Botanic Ridge - Junction Village in 2011 compared to the City of Casey shows that there was a lower proportion of couple families with child(ren) as well as a lower proportion of one-parent families. Overall, 38.3% of total families were couple families with child(ren), and 6.3% were one-parent families, compared with 44.4% and 12.6% respectively for the City of Casey.

There were a higher proportion of lone person households and a higher proportion of couples without children. Overall, the proportion of lone person households was 17.7% compared to 15.3% in the City of Casey while the proportion of couples without children was 33.1% compared to 21.8% in the City of Casey.

Emerging groups

The number of households in Botanic Ridge - Junction Village increased by 591 between 2006 and 2011.

The largest changes in family/household types in Botanic Ridge - Junction Village between 2006 and 2011 were:

  • Couples with children (+272 households)
  • Couples without children (+195 households)
  • Lone person (+63 households)