City of BrimbankCommunity profile
Skip to content

In Keilor District, 81% of households were purchasing or fully owned their home, 10.1% were renting privately, and 0.3% were in social housing in 2011.

Keilor District's Housing Tenure data provides insights into its socio-economic status as well as the role it plays in the housing market. For example, a high concentration of private renters may indicate a transient area attractive to young singles and couples, while a concentration of home owners indicates a more settled area with mature families and empty-nesters (Household Summary). Tenure can also reflect built form (Dwelling Type), with a significantly higher share of renters in high density housing and a substantially larger proportion of home-owners in separate houses, although this is not always the case.

In conjunction with other socio-economic status indicators in Keilor District, Tenure data is useful for analysing housing markets, housing affordability and identifying public housing areas.

Derived from the Census questions:

'Is this dwelling (owned outright, owned with a mortgage etc.)', and 'If this dwelling is being rented, who is it rented from?'

Households

Housing tenure
Keilor District20112006Change
Tenure typeNumber%City of Brimbank %Number%City of Brimbank %2006 to 2011
map this data in atlas.idFully owned1,73647.734.91,84850.837.7-112
map this data in atlas.idMortgage1,22233.634.21,18732.634.8+35
Renting
39610.922.33349.219.1+62
map this data in atlas.idRenting - Social housing120.32.380.22.4+4
map this data in atlas.idRenting - Private36710.119.43058.416.0+62
Renting - Not stated
170.50.6210.60.6-4
Other tenure type
712.00.6551.50.6+16
Not stated
2125.88.02135.87.8-1

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2006 and 2011. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Housing tenure, 2011
Housing tenure, 2011 Other tenure type, City of Brimbank: 0.6% Renting - Private, City of Brimbank: 19.4% Renting - Social housing, City of Brimbank: 2.3% Renting, City of Brimbank: 22.3% Mortgage, City of Brimbank: 34.2% Fully owned, City of Brimbank: 34.9% Other tenure type, Keilor District: 2.0% Renting - Private, Keilor District: 10.1% Renting - Social housing, Keilor District: 0.3% Renting, Keilor District: 10.9% Mortgage, Keilor District: 33.6% Fully owned, Keilor District: 47.7%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in housing tenure, 2006 to 2011
Change in housing tenure, 2006 to 2011 Other tenure type, Keilor District: +16 Renting - Private, Keilor District: +62 Renting - Social housing, Keilor District: +4 Renting, Keilor District: +62 Mortgage, Keilor District: +35 Fully owned, Keilor District: -112
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2006 and 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

Analysis of the housing tenure of the population of Keilor District in 2011 compared to City of Brimbank shows that there was a larger proportion of households who owned their dwelling; a smaller proportion purchasing their dwelling; and a smaller proportion who were renters.

Overall, 47.7% of the population owned their dwelling; 33.6% were purchasing, and 10.9% were renting, compared with 34.9%, 34.2% and 22.3% respectively for City of Brimbank.

Emerging groups

The largest changes in housing tenure categories for the households in Keilor District between 2006 and 2011 were:

  • Fully owned (-112 persons)
  • Renting - Private (+62 persons)

The total number of households in Keilor District increased by 2 between 2006 and 2011.