idc-logo
svg rectangle color
Blacktown City CouncilCommunity profile

Blacktown City

SEIFA by profile area

reset

In 2021, The Ponds had the highest level of Advantage in Blacktown City Council, with a SEIFA index score of 1,162.0.

The Blacktown City Council Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) measure the relative level of socio-economic disadvantage and/or advantage based on a range of Census characteristics. Two of the SEIFA indexes: the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD) and the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD) can be selected below.

Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD)

This index contains only disadvantage indicators (e.g. unemployment, low incomes or education levels, single parent families, low skilled occupations, poor English proficiency), so is best used to distinguish between disadvantaged areas, but doesn’t differentiate between those areas which are highly advantaged, and those just lacking a lot of disadvantage (with population close to the middle). This index is most commonly used for funding allocations and advocacy, because it highlights the areas of most need.

Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD)

This index contains indicators of disadvantage as well as additional indicators of advantage (e.g. professional occupations, high income, higher education levels, high rent, large dwellings), Characteristics are also weighted differently than the IRSD, so areas do score differently on either measure. Often the IRSAD index will show a more "spread out" distribution with a greater range of scores from very high to very low, due to its ability to measure advantage above the average level.

SEIFA indexes are a good place to start to get a general view of the relative level of disadvantage in one area compared to others, but it is important to also look at these underlying characteristics as they can differ markedly between areas with similar SEIFA scores and shed light on the type of disadvantage being experienced.

A higher score on the index means a lower level of disadvantage, or (in the case of IRSAD only) a higher level of advantage. A lower score on the index means a higher level of disadvantage on both indexes, and a lack of advantage on the IRSAD.

The percentile column indicates the approximate position of this small area in a ranked list of Australia’s suburbs and localities in 2021. It's meant to give a broad indication of where the area sits within the whole nation. A higher number indicates a higher socio-economic status. For instance, a percentile of 72 indicates that approximately 72% of Australia’s suburbs have a SEIFA index lower than this area (more disadvantaged), while 28% are higher. This applies a comparison to suburbs even when the index concerned doesn’t relate to a suburb.

Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage
Blacktown City Council's small areas and benchmark areas
Area2021 indexPercentile
The Ponds1,162.0100
Colebee1,138.799
Kellyville Ridge1,133.899
Stanhope Gardens1,123.298
Marsden Park – Shanes Park – Melonba1,121.098
Glenwood1,120.598
Marsden Park Precinct1,119.298
Schofields - Nirimba Fields1,117.197
Tallawong - Rouse Hill1,116.297
Riverstone Precinct1,105.396
Ward 11,102.596
Acacia Gardens - Parklea1,099.796
Bungarribee1,099.196
Kings Langley1,086.694
Woodcroft1,066.489
Greater Sydney1,045.082
Quakers Hill1,042.081
Kings Park1,034.477
Riverstone – Vineyard – Grantham Farm1,034.277
Ropes Crossing1,025.973
Prospect - Huntingwood - Arndell Park1,020.670
Ward 21,020.370
New South Wales1,016.067
Blacktown City1,005.662
Toongabbie1,003.060
Australia1,002.660
Minchinbury996.656
Greater Western Sydney Region996.556
Seven Hills995.856
Plumpton987.751
WSROC Region987.751
Blacktown Precinct982.749
Ward 3975.944
Ward 4975.944
Oakhurst975.444
Glendenning974.043
Rooty Hill - Eastern Creek966.239
Blacktown965.038
Hassall Grove958.034
Dean Park955.933
Marayong947.029
Lalor Park934.123
Ward 5933.623
Mount Druitt910.315
Mount Druitt Precinct908.214
Doonside906.114
Dharruk860.76
Hebersham853.85
Emerton808.23
Whalan804.43
Blackett801.83
Shalvey797.62
Lethbridge Park773.72
Tregear768.62
Willmot762.42
Bidwill712.61
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2021. Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (informed decisions).
Please refer to specific data notes for more information

DISCLAIMER: While all due care has been taken to ensure that the content of this website is accurate and current, there may be errors or omissions in it and no legal responsibility is accepted for the information and opinions in this website.

Please view our Privacy Policy, Terms of use and Legal notices.

ABS Data and the copyright in the ABS Data remains the property of the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The copyright in the way .id has modified, transformed or reconfigured the ABS Data as published on this website remains the property of .id. ABS Data can be accessed from the Australian Bureau of Statistics at www.abs.gov.au. ABS data can be used under license - terms published on ABS website. intermediary.management@abs.gov.au if you have any queries or wish to distribute any ABS data.