Bankstown City CouncilCommunity profile
Skip to content

Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill

Equivalised household income

Assuming all households were the same size, the 'lowest' quartile was the largest income group in Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill in 2011.

While Household Income is a useful measure, it is difficult to tell if changes over time and between geographic areas are due to actual changes in income levels, or due to changes in household size and composition. For example, an increase in lower income households could be due to job losses in key economic sectors, or simply due to decreasing household size as adult children leave home.

Equivalised Household Income puts all households on an equal footing independent of household size and composition to enable a true comparison between areas and over time. It is an indicator of the income resource available to a household of standard size and is the best measure of the changing economic fortunes of households living in Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill.

A detailed explanation of how Equivalised Household Income quartiles are calculated and interpreted is available in specific data notes.

Derived from the Census question:

'What is the total of all wages/salaries, government benefits, pensions, allowances and other income the person usually receives?'

Family, group and lone person households

Equivalised household income quartiles
Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill20112006Change
Quartile groupNumber%Bankstown City %Number%Bankstown City %2006 to 2011
Lowest group30032.432.930833.331.8-8
Medium lowest25928.027.523925.927.1+20
Medium highest24526.523.924526.524.40
Highest group12213.215.713114.216.6-9

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2006 and 2011. Compiled and presented by .id , the population experts.

Equivalised household income - Quartile group dollar ranges
Calculated from income data for New South Wales Weekly income by Census year
Equivalised household income ranges
2011
2006
2001
Lowest group $0 to $421 $0 to $347 $0 to $284
Medium lowest $422 to $756 $348 to $608 $285 to $500
Medium highest $757 to $1,243 $609 to $1,022 $501 to $823
Highest group $1,244 and over $1,023 and over $824 and over

Equivalised household income quartiles, 2011
Equivalised household income quartiles, 2011 Highest group, Bankstown City: 15.7% Medium highest, Bankstown City: 23.9% Medium lowest, Bankstown City: 27.5% Lowest group, Bankstown City: 32.9% Highest group, Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill: 13.2% Medium highest, Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill: 26.5% Medium lowest, Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill: 28.0% Lowest group, Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill: 32.4%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.
Change in equivalised household income quartiles, 2006 to 2011
Change in equivalised household income quartiles, 2006 to 2011 Highest group, Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill: -9 Medium highest, Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill: 0 Medium lowest, Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill: +20 Lowest group, Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill: -8
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2006 and 2011 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id, the population experts.

Dominant groups

Equivalised income quartiles allow us to compare relative income-earning capabilities across time. Because the data is equivalised, households of different size and composition are placed on an equal footing.

Analysis of the distribution of households by income quartile in Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill compared to Bankstown City shows that there was a lesser proportion of households in the highest equivalised income quartile, as well as a lesser proportion in the lowest equivalised income quartile.

Emerging groups

The most significant change in Birrong - Regents Park - Potts Hill between 2006 and 2011 was in the medium lowest quartile which showed an increase of 20 households.